SALAMANCA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

251

47%

LEVEL 2

203

38%

LEVEL 3

63

12%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

242

47%

LEVEL 2

208

40%

LEVEL 3

61

12%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

109

43%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

112

45%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

142

51%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

149

55%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

110

56%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

88

43%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

187

41%

LEVEL 2

192

42%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

184

40%

LEVEL 2

203

45%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

64

85%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

58

91%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

72

50%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

190

54%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

197

52%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.