Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

167

40%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

80

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

68

37%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

103

48%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

90

46%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

158

40%

LEVEL 2

147

37%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

138

38%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

100

30%

LEVEL 2

139

42%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

80

27%

LEVEL 2

126

42%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

67

82%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

66

85%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

69

31%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

50

28%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

98

52%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

95

48%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.