Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

209

28%

LEVEL 2

298

40%

LEVEL 3

180

24%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

210

29%

LEVEL 2

264

37%

LEVEL 3

173

24%

LEVEL 4

67

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

95

27%

LEVEL 2

145

42%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

98

29%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

114

29%

LEVEL 2

153

39%

LEVEL 3

96

24%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

148

39%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 699

LEVEL 1

191

27%

LEVEL 2

284

41%

LEVEL 3

172

25%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

193

29%

LEVEL 2

247

37%

LEVEL 3

165

25%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

136

21%

LEVEL 2

277

43%

LEVEL 3

177

27%

LEVEL 4

54

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

140

22%

LEVEL 2

254

40%

LEVEL 3

172

27%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

73

75%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

70

86%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

98

20%

LEVEL 2

183

38%

LEVEL 3

156

33%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

82

20%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

111

42%

LEVEL 2

115

44%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.