Skip to Content
Main content

WELLSVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

112

44%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

51

39%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

52

37%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

32

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

61

50%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

63

47%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

103

41%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

91

38%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

30

88%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

42

34%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

70

55%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

82

51%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.