ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

274

46%

LEVEL 2

209

35%

LEVEL 3

80

13%

LEVEL 4

32

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 537

LEVEL 1

267

50%

LEVEL 2

185

34%

LEVEL 3

69

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

122

41%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

152

51%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

151

57%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

268

47%

LEVEL 2

200

35%

LEVEL 3

76

13%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

257

50%

LEVEL 2

177

34%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

199

39%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

80

16%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

188

41%

LEVEL 2

182

40%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

75

88%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

79

95%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

75

33%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

199

54%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

197

56%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

33

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.