KIPP STAR COLLEGE PREP CHARTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

143

47%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

125

38%

LEVEL 2

142

43%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

75

50%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

70

44%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

63

41%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

93

48%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

80

43%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

64

47%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

130

51%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

121

49%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

34

67%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

54

66%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

137

48%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

114

36%

LEVEL 2

137

44%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

124

48%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.