TAG YOUNG SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

124

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

46

13%

LEVEL 3

131

38%

LEVEL 4

160

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

73

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

25

13%

LEVEL 3

72

38%

LEVEL 4

87

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

51

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

73

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

47

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

103
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

73

66%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

59

41%

LEVEL 4

39

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

96
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

56

44%

LEVEL 4

40

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

27

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

37

44%

LEVEL 4

31

37%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

53

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

72

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

39

20%

LEVEL 3

78

40%

LEVEL 4

71

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

82

40%

LEVEL 4

88

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.