Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST EAST NY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

223

50%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

233

50%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

122

48%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

121

47%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

101

51%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

112

54%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

194

50%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

133
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

198

50%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

32

50%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

86

20%

LEVEL 2

217

51%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

217

52%

LEVEL 3

122

29%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

40

51%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

40

51%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

183

49%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

193

50%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.