Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ALBANY COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

130

52%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

129

40%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

67

48%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

63

56%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

63

42%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

119

53%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

119

40%

LEVEL 2

121

40%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

125

51%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

78

33%

LEVEL 2

123

51%

LEVEL 3

32

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

119

40%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.