ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

136

47%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

112

44%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

82

48%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

54

46%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

49

49%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

109

53%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

81

47%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

14

40%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

129

48%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

57

46%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

79

48%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

72

48%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.