Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN ASCEND CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

166

48%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

116

25%

LEVEL 2

210

46%

LEVEL 3

120

26%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

80

49%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

92

44%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

65

35%

LEVEL 2

86

46%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

97

29%

LEVEL 2

159

48%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

128
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

111

26%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

154

48%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

190

47%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

30

56%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

147

49%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

103

27%

LEVEL 2

181

47%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.