Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX ACADEMY OF PROMISE CS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

106

45%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

145

46%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

59

45%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

91

52%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

42

40%

LEVEL 2

47

45%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

48

35%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

53

44%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

57

35%

LEVEL 2

70

43%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

92

46%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

123

47%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

23

61%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

58

31%

LEVEL 2

87

47%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

27

54%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

31

49%

LEVEL 2

27

43%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

97

45%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

74

26%

LEVEL 2

131

47%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.