SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 847

LEVEL 1

272

32%

LEVEL 2

344

41%

LEVEL 3

189

22%

LEVEL 4

42

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

262

36%

LEVEL 2

256

36%

LEVEL 3

149

21%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

112

26%

LEVEL 2

174

41%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

119

34%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

160

38%

LEVEL 2

170

40%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

150

41%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 790

LEVEL 1

257

33%

LEVEL 2

324

41%

LEVEL 3

169

21%

LEVEL 4

40

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

241

37%

LEVEL 2

238

36%

LEVEL 3

133

20%

LEVEL 4

48

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

169

24%

LEVEL 2

321

45%

LEVEL 3

186

26%

LEVEL 4

42

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

165

27%

LEVEL 2

250

41%

LEVEL 3

146

24%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

103

80%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

97

92%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

98

23%

LEVEL 2

176

41%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

83

23%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

179

49%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.