Skip to Content
Main content

LE ROY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

164

29%

LEVEL 2

208

37%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

168

36%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

197

38%

LEVEL 3

134

26%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

202

39%

LEVEL 3

137

27%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

90

21%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

40

85%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

29

78%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

81

21%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

59

20%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

83

47%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

74

45%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

187
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

162

29%

LEVEL 2

205

37%

LEVEL 3

138

25%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.