Skip to Content
Main content

BATAVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 687

LEVEL 1

233

34%

LEVEL 2

272

40%

LEVEL 3

129

19%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

159

37%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

59

28%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

142

38%

LEVEL 2

155

42%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

94

41%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

149

28%

LEVEL 2

222

42%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

33

62%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

158

27%

LEVEL 2

258

43%

LEVEL 3

128

21%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

75

82%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

46

75%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

176

47%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

124

51%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.