Skip to Content
Main content

VILLAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

121

21%

LEVEL 2

254

44%

LEVEL 3

150

26%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

116

41%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

138

48%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

106

20%

LEVEL 2

232

44%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

14

61%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

84

16%

LEVEL 2

236

45%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

148

45%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

18

32%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

28

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

74

18%

LEVEL 2

182

44%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

41

37%

LEVEL 2

53

47%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.