WILLIAMSON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

209

44%

LEVEL 3

104

22%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

41

26%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

121

48%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

93

24%

LEVEL 2

175

45%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

20

51%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

192

48%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

134

45%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

53

85%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

119

26%

LEVEL 2

207

45%

LEVEL 3

104

22%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

76

40%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

72

39%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

71

42%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.