Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

134

31%

LEVEL 2

208

48%

LEVEL 3

79

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

164

34%

LEVEL 2

225

46%

LEVEL 3

86

18%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

64

30%

LEVEL 2

104

49%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

106

48%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

104

47%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

72

34%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

72

29%

LEVEL 2

131

53%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

91

34%

LEVEL 2

132

50%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

183

50%

LEVEL 3

74

20%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

113

29%

LEVEL 2

189

48%

LEVEL 3

81

21%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

38

55%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

51

55%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

116

29%

LEVEL 2

200

49%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

143

32%

LEVEL 2

216

48%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

18

69%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

21

54%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

123

30%

LEVEL 2

195

48%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

152

34%

LEVEL 2

204

46%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.