Skip to Content
Main content

PEARLS HAWTHORNE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

436
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

30

5%

LEVEL 2

198

30%

LEVEL 3

289

44%

LEVEL 4

147

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

33

6%

LEVEL 2

160

27%

LEVEL 3

257

44%

LEVEL 4

140

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

259
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

160

42%

LEVEL 4

99

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

231
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

151

46%

LEVEL 4

80

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

129

45%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

110
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

68

51%

LEVEL 4

42

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

63

51%

LEVEL 4

41

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

71

45%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

34

38%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

38

48%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

154
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

105

41%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

90

41%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

21

3%

LEVEL 2

187

29%

LEVEL 3

286

45%

LEVEL 4

146

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

254

45%

LEVEL 4

135

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

260
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

176

47%

LEVEL 4

84

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

137

43%

LEVEL 4

95

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

120

45%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.