Skip to Content
Main content

EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS MICROSOCIETY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

173

46%

LEVEL 2

160

42%

LEVEL 3

43

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

165

45%

LEVEL 2

141

39%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

102

48%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

77

42%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

95

57%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

95

53%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

159

47%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

152

46%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

144

43%

LEVEL 2

150

45%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

136

42%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

32

86%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

131

52%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

116

45%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

98

77%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

80

75%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

149

45%

LEVEL 2

140

42%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

162

45%

LEVEL 2

139

39%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.