Skip to Content
Main content

PATRICIA A DICHIARO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

145

43%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

67

41%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

74

40%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

19

54%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

47

43%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

42

42%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

108

43%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

35

42%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

143

43%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

71

37%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

74

49%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.