Skip to Content
Main content

FOX MEADOW SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

125

46%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

68

51%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

51

44%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

56

41%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

23

52%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

91

47%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

68

40%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

124

48%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

96

41%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

9

60%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

125

47%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.