BRUNO M PONTERIO RIDGE STREET SCHOO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

146

45%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

97

37%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

63

37%

LEVEL 3

71

42%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

75

47%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

8

73%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

131

46%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

144

48%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

16

55%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.