NORTH SALEM CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

204

36%

LEVEL 4

130

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

54

13%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

154

37%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

70

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

89

44%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

6

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

9

60%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

284
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

171

35%

LEVEL 4

113

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

20

39%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

330
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

150

30%

LEVEL 3

201

40%

LEVEL 4

129

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

153

41%

LEVEL 4

82

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

42

64%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

31

67%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

334
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

204

36%

LEVEL 4

130

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

315
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

153

30%

LEVEL 3

197

38%

LEVEL 4

118

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

226
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

146

39%

LEVEL 4

80

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

13

27%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

13

30%

LEVEL 2

20

45%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.