Skip to Content
Main content

BENJAMIN TURNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

216

54%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

237

53%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

95

49%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

98

43%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

136

65%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

139

64%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

202

54%

LEVEL 2

147

39%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

219

54%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

142

49%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

160

45%

LEVEL 2

156

44%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

95

86%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

77

85%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

30
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

212

53%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

25

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

232

53%

LEVEL 2

166

38%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

45

45%

LEVEL 2

44

44%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

38

39%

LEVEL 2

46

47%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

171

56%

LEVEL 2

112

37%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

199

57%

LEVEL 2

121

35%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.