Skip to Content
Main content

CONCORD ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

110

38%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

49

38%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

26

43%

LEVEL 4

13

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

76

42%

LEVEL 3

67

37%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

18

50%

LEVEL 3

14

39%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.