Skip to Content
Main content

ANNE HUTCHINSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

53

36%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

17

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

75

40%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

20

49%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

116

40%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

29

53%

LEVEL 2

23

42%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

23

62%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.