KATONAH-LEWISBORO UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

970
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,575

LEVEL 1

138

9%

LEVEL 2

467

30%

LEVEL 3

635

40%

LEVEL 4

335

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

778
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,315

LEVEL 1

129

10%

LEVEL 2

408

31%

LEVEL 3

488

37%

LEVEL 4

290

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

529
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 812

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

229

28%

LEVEL 3

323

40%

LEVEL 4

206

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

431
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

181

27%

LEVEL 3

252

38%

LEVEL 4

179

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

441
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 763

LEVEL 1

84

11%

LEVEL 2

238

31%

LEVEL 3

312

41%

LEVEL 4

129

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

347
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

77

12%

LEVEL 2

227

35%

LEVEL 3

236

36%

LEVEL 4

111

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

46
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

33

47%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

37
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

23

47%

LEVEL 4

10

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

17

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

837
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,334

LEVEL 1

109

8%

LEVEL 2

388

29%

LEVEL 3

538

40%

LEVEL 4

299

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

668
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,105

LEVEL 1

95

9%

LEVEL 2

342

31%

LEVEL 3

435

39%

LEVEL 4

233

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

48

42%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

24

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

924
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,297

LEVEL 1

26

2%

LEVEL 2

347

27%

LEVEL 3

597

46%

LEVEL 4

327

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

750
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,086

LEVEL 1

30

3%

LEVEL 2

306

28%

LEVEL 3

464

43%

LEVEL 4

286

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

38

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

99

43%

LEVEL 2

102

45%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

778
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,310

LEVEL 1

126

10%

LEVEL 2

406

31%

LEVEL 3

488

37%

LEVEL 4

290

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

956
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,528

LEVEL 1

124

8%

LEVEL 2

448

29%

LEVEL 3

623

41%

LEVEL 4

333

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

761
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,254

LEVEL 1

105

8%

LEVEL 2

388

31%

LEVEL 3

475

38%

LEVEL 4

286

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.