Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

132

38%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

124

44%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

89

46%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

80

53%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

70

58%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

116

38%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

106

43%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

14

58%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

96

31%

LEVEL 2

139

45%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

84

34%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

36

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

40

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

58

46%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

33

33%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

105

48%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

103

55%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

5

83%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.