GLENS FALLS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

183

33%

LEVEL 2

225

40%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

167

33%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

71

26%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

99

37%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

157

32%

LEVEL 2

205

41%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

147

32%

LEVEL 2

185

40%

LEVEL 3

88

19%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

211

45%

LEVEL 3

110

24%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

197

45%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

77

83%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

63

84%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

135

45%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

117

46%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

109

48%

LEVEL 2

90

40%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.