HIGHLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

236

32%

LEVEL 2

307

42%

LEVEL 3

137

19%

LEVEL 4

57

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

150

36%

LEVEL 2

155

37%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

88

24%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

153

41%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

172

31%

LEVEL 2

222

40%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

28

55%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

38

48%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

144

23%

LEVEL 2

288

46%

LEVEL 3

137

22%

LEVEL 4

57

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

92

83%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

43

88%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

106

24%

LEVEL 2

187

42%

LEVEL 3

100

23%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.