Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

187

43%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

166

45%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

79

38%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

108

49%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

177

43%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

159

45%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

139

38%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

43

88%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

123

51%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

112

54%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.