Skip to Content
Main content

CANDOR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

143

44%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

143

48%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

38

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

81

51%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

80

57%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

130

44%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

131

48%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

103

36%

LEVEL 2

131

46%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

98

39%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

45

94%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

74

46%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

57

41%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

94

56%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

86

54%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.