Skip to Content
Main content

WAVERLY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 738

LEVEL 1

275

37%

LEVEL 2

271

37%

LEVEL 3

139

19%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

227

34%

LEVEL 2

263

39%

LEVEL 3

136

20%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

92

28%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

163

45%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

135

40%

LEVEL 2

132

39%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

270

38%

LEVEL 2

262

37%

LEVEL 3

132

18%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

223

34%

LEVEL 2

255

39%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

179

29%

LEVEL 2

260

41%

LEVEL 3

136

22%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

153

26%

LEVEL 2

257

44%

LEVEL 3

134

23%

LEVEL 4

44

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

96

87%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

74

90%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

130

38%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

190

48%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

146

41%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.