Skip to Content
Main content

SULLIVAN WEST CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

151

30%

LEVEL 2

186

37%

LEVEL 3

120

24%

LEVEL 4

42

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

120

34%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

90

35%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

77

42%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

126

30%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

99

23%

LEVEL 2

178

41%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

82

26%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

92

43%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

73

44%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.