Skip to Content
Main content

BENJAMIN COSOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

193

52%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

185

57%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

81

48%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

88

59%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

112

55%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

97

56%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

71

47%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

54

52%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

20

59%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

92

56%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

99

60%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

134

43%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

136

50%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

59

92%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

49

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

163

48%

LEVEL 2

128

38%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

149

52%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

30

88%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

36

90%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

29

43%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

162

56%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

156

61%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

39
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

174

56%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.