Skip to Content
Main content

R J O INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

101

19%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

89

18%

LEVEL 2

187

38%

LEVEL 3

174

35%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

89

35%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

188

41%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

52

73%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

227
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

97

18%

LEVEL 2

204

39%

LEVEL 3

179

34%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

193

39%

LEVEL 3

173

35%

LEVEL 4

47

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.