Skip to Content
Main content

GREAT HOLLOW MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 864

LEVEL 1

109

13%

LEVEL 2

348

40%

LEVEL 3

278

32%

LEVEL 4

129

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

51

13%

LEVEL 2

164

40%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

237
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

155

36%

LEVEL 3

162

38%

LEVEL 4

75

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

193

45%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

21

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

19

42%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

343
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

96

13%

LEVEL 2

310

41%

LEVEL 3

241

32%

LEVEL 4

102

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

22

47%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

18

46%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

398
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

49

6%

LEVEL 2

309

41%

LEVEL 3

269

36%

LEVEL 4

129

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

153

41%

LEVEL 3

126

34%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

60

56%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

390
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 806

LEVEL 1

91

11%

LEVEL 2

325

40%

LEVEL 3

264

33%

LEVEL 4

126

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.