Skip to Content
Main content

OAKDALE-BOHEMIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

172

27%

LEVEL 2

279

44%

LEVEL 3

140

22%

LEVEL 4

37

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

109

45%

LEVEL 3

56

23%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

45

44%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

156

47%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

46

33%

LEVEL 2

64

46%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

152

27%

LEVEL 2

247

44%

LEVEL 3

130

23%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

95

45%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

19

49%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

113

20%

LEVEL 2

271

48%

LEVEL 3

139

25%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

104

47%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

59

87%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

140

26%

LEVEL 2

242

45%

LEVEL 3

124

23%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

92

45%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.