Skip to Content
Main content

RONKONKOMA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

158

27%

LEVEL 2

270

46%

LEVEL 3

111

19%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

42

23%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

39

42%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

94

30%

LEVEL 2

145

46%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

26

57%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

126

29%

LEVEL 2

200

45%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

55

47%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

37

45%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

98

19%

LEVEL 2

249

49%

LEVEL 3

109

22%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

60

72%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

104

24%

LEVEL 2

202

47%

LEVEL 3

91

21%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

25

52%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.