HAUPPAUGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

101

16%

LEVEL 2

279

44%

LEVEL 3

186

29%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

108

38%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

126

43%

LEVEL 3

92

31%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

153

44%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

21

51%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

11

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

80

15%

LEVEL 2

232

43%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

64

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

17

41%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

66

11%

LEVEL 2

253

44%

LEVEL 3

184

32%

LEVEL 4

73

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

35

56%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

87

15%

LEVEL 2

252

43%

LEVEL 3

181

31%

LEVEL 4

72

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

27

57%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.