Skip to Content
Main content

HARBORFIELDS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

860
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,537

LEVEL 1

151

10%

LEVEL 2

526

34%

LEVEL 3

601

39%

LEVEL 4

259

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

590
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,064

LEVEL 1

129

12%

LEVEL 2

345

32%

LEVEL 3

432

41%

LEVEL 4

158

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

453
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 769

LEVEL 1

59

8%

LEVEL 2

257

33%

LEVEL 3

290

38%

LEVEL 4

163

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

327
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

50

9%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

218

41%

LEVEL 4

109

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

407
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

92

12%

LEVEL 2

269

35%

LEVEL 3

311

40%

LEVEL 4

96

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

263
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

79

15%

LEVEL 2

187

35%

LEVEL 3

214

40%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

29

44%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

22

37%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

721
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,240

LEVEL 1

98

8%

LEVEL 2

421

34%

LEVEL 3

502

40%

LEVEL 4

219

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

484
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 814

LEVEL 1

75

9%

LEVEL 2

255

31%

LEVEL 3

352

43%

LEVEL 4

132

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

26

38%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

20

37%

LEVEL 2

19

35%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

831
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,298

LEVEL 1

47

4%

LEVEL 2

420

32%

LEVEL 3

574

44%

LEVEL 4

257

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

584
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 942

LEVEL 1

64

7%

LEVEL 2

294

31%

LEVEL 3

426

45%

LEVEL 4

158

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

104

44%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

65

53%

LEVEL 2

51

42%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

833
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,391

LEVEL 1

103

7%

LEVEL 2

455

33%

LEVEL 3

579

42%

LEVEL 4

254

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

551
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 914

LEVEL 1

72

8%

LEVEL 2

291

32%

LEVEL 3

401

44%

LEVEL 4

150

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

48

33%

LEVEL 2

71

49%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.