Skip to Content
Main content

CANDLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 892

LEVEL 1

147

16%

LEVEL 2

311

35%

LEVEL 3

279

31%

LEVEL 4

155

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

63

13%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

106

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

227
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

87

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

207
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

84

18%

LEVEL 2

187

39%

LEVEL 3

139

29%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

83

32%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

31

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

42

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

289
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

204

36%

LEVEL 3

188

33%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

39

39%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

23

29%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

49

7%

LEVEL 2

260

36%

LEVEL 3

266

36%

LEVEL 4

154

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

133

32%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

104

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

98

60%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

34

62%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

395
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

92

12%

LEVEL 2

262

35%

LEVEL 3

255

34%

LEVEL 4

140

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

95

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

55

38%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.