NATHANIEL WOODHULL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

139

41%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

46

39%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

73

47%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

65

56%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

35

36%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

46

48%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

51

55%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

89

42%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

22

96%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

98

45%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

13

93%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

34

35%

LEVEL 2

42

43%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

100

54%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

77

56%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.