JOSEPH A EDGAR INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

176

33%

LEVEL 2

200

38%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

58

28%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

28

26%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

100

41%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

30

30%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

32

56%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

12

40%

LEVEL 2

14

47%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

190

42%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

69

84%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

156

31%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

136

27%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

20

95%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

143

39%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

25

38%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.