Skip to Content
Main content

SENECA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

184

41%

LEVEL 3

104

23%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

66

33%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

46

48%

LEVEL 3

21

22%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

42

40%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

93

26%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

23

52%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

171

46%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

36

22%

LEVEL 2

81

49%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

64

80%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

30

81%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

69

46%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

42

35%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

23

45%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.