SENECA FALLS CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

232

40%

LEVEL 2

185

32%

LEVEL 3

115

20%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

174

38%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

92

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

91

34%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

86

39%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

141

45%

LEVEL 2

105

34%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

110

47%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

17

63%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

183

36%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

48

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

130

34%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

24

86%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

170

33%

LEVEL 2

180

35%

LEVEL 3

115

22%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

158

39%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

62

93%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

91

26%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

138

61%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.