WATKINS GLEN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

155

31%

LEVEL 2

205

41%

LEVEL 3

110

22%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

157

37%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

58

29%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

89

34%

LEVEL 2

114

44%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

79

36%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

192

41%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

145

39%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

102

23%

LEVEL 2

191

44%

LEVEL 3

108

25%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

53

77%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

56

89%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.