Skip to Content
Main content

ODESSA-MONTOUR CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

117

34%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

125

42%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

83

46%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

54

34%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

71

50%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

119

42%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

130

46%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

50

83%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

41

95%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

51

36%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

77

42%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

87

54%

LEVEL 2

48

30%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.