Skip to Content
Main content

COBLESKILL-RICHMONDVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 799

LEVEL 1

291

36%

LEVEL 2

301

38%

LEVEL 3

159

20%

LEVEL 4

48

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

256

45%

LEVEL 2

181

32%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

36

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

97

37%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

179

44%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

62

15%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

159

51%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 756

LEVEL 1

273

36%

LEVEL 2

287

38%

LEVEL 3

149

20%

LEVEL 4

47

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

237

45%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

231

31%

LEVEL 2

298

40%

LEVEL 3

159

22%

LEVEL 4

48

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

195

38%

LEVEL 2

178

35%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

36

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

60

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

61

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

194

50%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.